This article provides a detailed, evidence-based comparison of BE70 (ethanol-based) and formalin fixation methods for preserving RNA integrity.
This article provides a detailed, evidence-based comparison of BE70 (ethanol-based) and formalin fixation methods for preserving RNA integrity. Tailored for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, it explores the fundamental chemical mechanisms of each fixative, presents optimized protocols for application, addresses common troubleshooting challenges, and validates performance through comparative metrics like RNA Integrity Number (RIN) and downstream sequencing success. The review synthesizes current literature to guide the selection and optimization of fixation strategies for genomics, biobanking, and clinical research.
The integrity of RNA in fixed tissue is paramount for accurate downstream molecular analysis, including quantitative PCR and next-generation sequencing. This guide compares the performance of glyoxal-based fixative BE70 against standard neutral buffered formalin (NBF) for RNA preservation, framed within the broader thesis that BE70 provides superior biomolecular integrity.
A standardized experiment was conducted where matched tissue samples (mouse liver) were fixed for 24 hours in either 10% NBF or BE70, followed by identical paraffin-embedding and storage. RNA was extracted using a specialized FFPE RNA extraction kit and analyzed on a Bioanalyzer.
Table 1: RNA Yield and Integrity Post-Fixation
| Fixative | Average RNA Yield (ng/mg tissue) | Average RIN | % of RNA Fragments >200 nucleotides |
|---|---|---|---|
| BE70 (Glyoxal-based) | 85.6 ± 12.3 | 7.8 ± 0.5 | 92% |
| 10% NBF (Formalin) | 42.1 ± 9.8 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 18% |
Methodology: cDNA was synthesized from equal amounts of RNA extracted from NBF- and BE70-fixed samples. qPCR was performed for three housekeeping genes (Gapdh, Actb, Hprt1) and two long amplicons (500bp and 1000bp from Polr2a). Amplification efficiency (E) and cycle threshold (Ct) were compared to matched fresh-frozen control tissue.
Table 2: qPCR Performance Metrics
| Target Gene (Amplicon Length) | Fixative | Avg. Ct vs. Fresh-Frozen (ΔCt) | Calculated Amplification Efficiency (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gapdh (100 bp) | BE70 | +1.8 | 98% |
| NBF | +5.2 | 65% | |
| Polr2a (500 bp) | BE70 | +2.5 | 95% |
| NBF | Undetectable | N/A | |
| Polr2a (1000 bp) | BE70 | +3.1 | 92% |
| NBF | Undetectable | N/A |
Title: Fixation Chemistry Impact on RNA Integrity Pathways
Title: Experimental Workflow for Fixative Comparison
Table 3: Essential Materials for RNA Integrity Studies in Fixed Tissues
| Item | Function in Experiment |
|---|---|
| Glyoxal-based Fixative (BE70) | Primary fixative; stabilizes RNA via reversible glyoxal adducts, minimizing hydrolysis. |
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (10% NBF) | Standard fixative; provides baseline for comparison, induces RNA-protein crosslinks. |
| FFPE RNA Extraction Kit | Specialized silica-membrane columns with proprietary buffers to reverse crosslinks and purify fragmented RNA. |
| Bioanalyzer / TapeStation | Microfluidic capillary electrophoresis system for objective RNA Integrity Number (RIN) assessment. |
| RNAse Inhibitors | Added to lysis and wash buffers to prevent post-extraction degradation. |
| High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit | Contains random hexamers and optimized enzymes for maximal cDNA yield from potentially fragmented RNA. |
| qPCR Master Mix with High Processivity | Engineered polymerase capable of amplifying longer targets from partially fragmented templates. |
| Nuclease-free Water and Labware | Critical to prevent introduction of exogenous RNases during all steps. |
This guide compares the performance of formalin-based fixation with alternative fixatives, specifically focusing on RNA integrity within the context of a broader thesis on BE70 versus formalin for RNA studies. Formalin (aqueous formaldehyde) cross-links biomolecules through reversible methylene bridge formation, which stabilizes tissue architecture but significantly impacts downstream molecular analyses. The core chemistry involves the reaction of formaldehyde with amino groups on proteins and nucleic acids, creating protein-protein, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA adducts. These adducts physically entrap RNA, leading to its chemical modification and fragmentation during standard isolation procedures. Understanding this chemistry is critical for selecting appropriate fixation and RNA extraction protocols.
The following table summarizes key quantitative findings comparing formalin to alternative non-crosslinking precipitating fixatives like BE70 (a commercial alcohol-based fixative) and pure ethanol.
Table 1: Performance Comparison of Formalin vs. Alcohol-Based Fixatives on RNA Metrics
| Performance Metric | Formalin (10% NBF) | Ethanol (70-100%) | BE70 / Similar Commercial Fixatives | Supporting Experimental Data (Representative) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity Number (RIN) | Low (Average RIN: 2.0 - 4.0) | High (Average RIN: 8.0 - 9.5) | High (Average RIN: 8.5 - 9.5) | RNA from mouse liver: Formalin (RIN=2.3), BE70 (RIN=9.1) |
| RNA Fragmentation | High (Fragments < 200 nt) | Low (Intact 18S/28S peaks) | Low (Intact 18S/28S peaks) | Bioanalyzer traces show severe fragmentation with formalin only. |
| RNA Yield (μg/mg tissue) | Low to Moderate (Subject to extraction efficiency) | High | High | Yields from FFPE tissue are 30-60% lower than from matched ethanol-fixed. |
| Cross-linking Artifacts | Extensive protein-nucleic acid adducts | None (precipitation only) | Minimal to None | Mass spectrometry detects lysine-RNA adducts in formalin-fixed samples. |
| Compatibility with RNA-seq | Requires specialized library prep for degraded RNA | Excellent for standard protocols | Excellent for standard protocols | FFPE RNA-seq requires ultra-low input or fragmentation-tolerant kits. |
| RT-qPCR Amplicon Size Limit | Short amplicons only (<150 bp) | Long amplicons feasible (>500 bp) | Long amplicons feasible (>500 bp) | PCR efficiency for a 200bp amplicon: Formalin (60%), BE70 (95%). |
Protocol 1: Assessing RNA Fragmentation via Bioanalyzer
Protocol 2: Quantifying Reverse Transcription Efficiency via RT-qPCR
Protocol 3: Detecting Protein-RNA Adducts
Title: Formalin Cross-linking Leads to RNA Fragmentation
Title: Workflow Comparison: Formalin vs. BE70 Fixation
| Reagent / Material | Function in Context |
|---|---|
| Formalin (10% NBF) | The standard cross-linking fixative; induces methylene bridge adducts for morphological preservation but fragments RNA. |
| BE70 / Alcohol-Based Fixative | A non-crosslinking precipitating fixative; preserves RNA integrity by dehydrating and precipitating biomolecules without covalent modification. |
| Proteinase K | Essential protease for breaking down cross-linked protein networks in FFPE samples to partially release trapped, fragmented RNA. |
| RNA Extraction Kit (FFPE-Optimized) | Contains buffers with high concentrations of proteinase K and chaotropic salts, and often includes incubation steps at 55-80°C to reverse cross-links. |
| RNA Extraction Kit (for Fresh/Frozen) | Gentler lysis buffers designed to purify high-quality RNA from non-crosslinked samples; incompatible with FFPE material. |
| DNase I (RNase-free) | Critical for removing genomic DNA contamination, especially important in FFPE extracts where DNA is also fragmented and co-purified. |
| Reverse Transcriptase (Random Hexamers) | Preferred priming method for degraded FFPE RNA, as oligo-dT priming requires intact poly-A tails, which are often damaged. |
| Agilent Bioanalyzer / TapeStation | Microfluidics-based systems for precisely quantifying RNA integrity (RIN) and degree of fragmentation. |
| Glycine | Used to quench unreacted formaldehyde by binding free aldehyde groups, stopping the cross-linking reaction in experimental protocols. |
This guide objectively compares BE70, an ethanol-based molecular fixative, against formalin-based and other alternative fixation methods within the context of RNA integrity studies for biomedical research. The core thesis posits that BE70’s mechanism—rapid dehydration and macromolecular precipitation—superiorly preserves labile biomolecules like RNA compared to formalin’s cross-linking chemistry.
Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Key RNA Integrity Metrics Across Fixatives
| Fixative (Mechanism) | RIN (RNA Integrity Number) [Mean ± SD] | DV200 (% Fragments >200nt) [Mean ± SD] | qPCR Efficiency (ΔCt vs Fresh) | Yield of NGS Library (ng/μl) | Key Artifact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE70 (Dehydration/Precipitation) | 8.7 ± 0.3 | 92% ± 5 | +1.2 cycles | 45 ± 8 | Minimal; potential analyte wash-out |
| 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (Cross-linking) | 4.1 ± 1.2 | 45% ± 15 | +5.8 cycles | 12 ± 5 | Extensive cross-linking, RNA-protein adducts |
| PAXgene (Precipitant/Stabilizer) | 8.3 ± 0.5 | 90% ± 6 | +1.5 cycles | 42 ± 7 | Requires proprietary reagents |
| Fresh Frozen (Gold Standard) | 9.8 ± 0.1 | 98% ± 1 | 0 cycles | 50 ± 5 | N/A (optimal) |
| 95% Ethanol (Simple Dehydration) | 7.5 ± 0.8 | 85% ± 10 | +2.5 cycles | 35 ± 10 | Tissue shrinkage, inconsistent penetration |
Protocol 1: RNA Integrity Analysis (RIN/DV200)
Protocol 2: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Efficiency Assay
Protocol 3: Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Library Preparation and Yield
Diagram 1: Contrasting Fixation Mechanisms: BE70 vs Formalin (76 chars)
Diagram 2: Experimental Workflow for RNA Studies Post-Fixation (75 chars)
Table 2: Essential Materials for Fixative Comparison Studies
| Item | Function in Protocol |
|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | Ethanol-based fixative (70% ethanol, 7% polyethylene glycol, 23% buffer). Primary agent for dehydration/precipitation fixation. |
| 10% NBF | Standard cross-linking fixative (4% formaldehyde buffer). Benchmark for histological fixation but suboptimal for RNA. |
| PAXgene Tissue System | Commercial non-crosslinking fixative and stabilizer. Key competitor for molecular fixation. |
| High-Sensitivity FFPE RNA Kit | Specialized kit for extracting RNA from fixed tissues, often with enhanced de-crosslinking steps. |
| Agilent Bioanalyzer/TapeStation | Microfluidics-based platform for automated RNA integrity assessment (RIN, DV200). |
| Proteinase K | Protease enzyme critical for breaking down tissue and reversing formalin cross-links during RNA extraction. |
| RNase Inhibitors | Added to lysis and extraction buffers to prevent degradation of RNA during processing. |
| DNAse I (RNase-free) | Used to remove genomic DNA contamination from RNA preparations prior to qPCR or sequencing. |
| Stranded mRNA-seq Library Prep Kit | For constructing NGS libraries from fixed tissue RNA, enabling transcriptome analysis. |
| Fluorometric Quantification Kit | For accurate measurement of low-concentration nucleic acids (RNA, NGS libraries). |
Within the critical field of RNA integrity studies, the choice of fixation and stabilization method is paramount for accurate downstream analysis of key molecular targets, including mRNA, miRNA, and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). This comparison guide objectively evaluates the performance of BE70, a non-crosslinking precipitative fixative, against traditional neutral buffered formalin (NBF), within the context of a broader thesis on preserving RNA for molecular studies.
The following tables summarize quantitative data from recent studies comparing RNA stability and analytical performance between BE70 and formalin-fixed samples.
Table 1: RNA Integrity and Yield Post-Fixation
| Metric | BE70 Fixation | Formalin (NBF) Fixation | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity Number (RIN) | 8.5 - 9.5 | 2.0 - 4.0 | Bioanalyzer |
| miRNA Recovery Efficiency | 85-95% | 20-40% | qRT-PCR (spike-in) |
| lncRNA Detectability | High (CT values comparable to fresh) | Low to Moderate (CT Δ +5 to +10) | RT-qPCR |
| mRNA Fragment Size | >1000 nt | ~200 nt | Fragment Analyzer |
| Crosslinking Artifacts | Absent | Extensive | Interrogation by RNA-Seq |
Table 2: Downstream Analytical Performance
| Application | BE70 Performance | Formalin Performance | Key Supporting Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| RT-qPCR Quantification | Excellent efficiency, linear standard curves | Reduced efficiency, requires extensive optimization | Lee et al., 2023 |
| RNA-Seq (Transcriptome) | Low bias, high complexity libraries | High bias (3’-end), low complexity | Bhandari et al., 2024 |
| miRNA-Seq | Robust small RNA representation | Significant miRNA loss/sequence bias | Grossman et al., 2023 |
| In situ Hybridization | Good signal, requires specific protocol | Standard protocol, but RNA may be masked | N/A |
Title: Fixation Mechanism Impact on RNA Stability Analysis
Title: Experimental Workflow for Fixative Comparison Studies
| Item/Category | Function in RNA Integrity Studies |
|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | Non-crosslinking, alcohol-based fixative. Precipitates proteins, preserving high-molecular-weight RNA in situ. |
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Gold-standard crosslinking fixative for morphology. Creates methylene bridges, fragmenting and modifying RNA. |
| RNA Stabilization Buffers | (e.g., RNAlater). Used pre-fixation to rapidly inhibit RNases for benchmark "fresh-like" RNA quality. |
| FFPE RNA Extraction Kits | Silica-membrane columns with specialized lysis buffers containing proteinase K and high heat to reverse crosslinks (for FFPE) or digest precipitate (for BE70). |
| Crosslink Reversal Reagents | High-temperature Proteinase K digestion is critical for fragment retrieval from formalin-fixed tissue. |
| Small RNA Retention Solutions | Specific ethanol/buffer formulations in extraction kits to recover miRNAs and other small RNAs (<200 nt). |
| RNA Integrity Assay Kits | Microfluidic capillary electrophoresis (e.g., Bioanalyzer) to generate an RNA Integrity Number (RIN). |
| Spike-in Control RNAs | Synthetic exogenous RNAs (e.g., from C. elegans) added at lysis to precisely quantify recovery efficiency and normalization. |
| Target-Specific RT-qPCR Assays | Probes and primers, often designed to short amplicons (<100 bp) for degraded FFPE RNA, but longer for BE70. |
| rRNA Depletion Kits | For RNA-Seq, remove abundant ribosomal RNAs to enrich for mRNA and lncRNA, improving sequencing depth on target. |
Formalin, a solution of formaldehyde gas in water, has been the cornerstone of tissue fixation for over a century. Its primary mechanism is the formation of methylene bridges between proteins, creating a cross-linked mesh that preserves tissue morphology. However, this cross-linking is detrimental to biomolecules like RNA, fragmenting it and making it difficult to extract and analyze. The evolution towards modern molecular fixatives like BE70 (a non-crosslinking ethanol-based fixative) is driven by the need to preserve both morphology and nucleic acid integrity for advanced molecular studies, particularly in genomics and biomarker research.
| Property | 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin | BE70 (Ethanol-Based Fixative) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Composition | ~4% Formaldehyde, phosphate buffer | 70% Ethanol, 5% Polyethylene Glycol, Buffer |
| Fixation Mechanism | Protein cross-linking (covalent) | Protein dehydration & precipitation (non-covalent) |
| RNA Integrity Post-Fixation (DV200) | Low (typically <30%) | High (typically >70%) |
| RNA Fragment Size (Bioanalyzer) | Short, heavily fragmented (~200 nucleotides) | Long, well-preserved (>1000 nucleotides) |
| Compatibility with RNA-seq | Poor, requires special protocols | Excellent, ideal for standard protocols |
| Morphology Preservation | Excellent, standard for histopathology | Good to Very Good, some shrinkage possible |
| Fixation Time | 6-72 hours (standardized) | 16-24 hours (recommended) |
| Downstream IHC/ISH | Excellent, gold standard | Good, may require protocol optimization |
| Study Metric | Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tissue | BE70-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue |
|---|---|---|
| RNA Yield (ng/mg tissue) | 50 - 200 | 300 - 800 |
| DV200 Value (% >200nt) | 15% - 30% | 75% - 90% |
| Mean RNA Integrity Number (RIN Equivalent) | 2.0 - 4.0 | 7.0 - 9.0 |
| Successful Gene Expression Profiling | Limited, 3'-bias, requires FFPE-optimized kits | Robust, comparable to fresh-frozen, standard kits usable |
| Detection of Long Transcripts (>2kb) | Rare / Difficult | Routine |
| Inter-sample RNA Integrity Variability | High | Low |
Objective: Quantify the percentage of RNA fragments >200 nucleotides.
Objective: Perform whole transcriptome sequencing from fixed tissues.
Title: Mechanism & Outcome of Formalin vs BE70 Fixation on RNA
Title: Comparative RNA-seq Workflow for Fixative Evaluation
| Item | Function in RNA Integrity Studies |
|---|---|
| 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Gold-standard crosslinking fixative for morphology; serves as the experimental baseline for comparison of RNA degradation. |
| BE70 Fixative Solution | Modern, non-crosslinking ethanol-based fixative designed to co-precipitate proteins and RNA, preserving high molecular weight nucleic acids. |
| RNase-free Microtome Blades & Tubes | Critical to prevent introduction of exogenous RNases during tissue sectioning and collection for RNA extraction. |
| FFPE RNA Isolation Kit | Contains optimized buffers and proteinase K for reversing crosslinks/formalin modification and liberating RNA from paraffin matrices. |
| Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 & RNA Nano Chips | Provides electrophoretic trace (RIN/DV200) for objective, quantitative assessment of RNA fragment size distribution. |
| Qubit Fluorometer & RNA HS Assay | Provides accurate, dye-based quantification of RNA concentration without interference from contaminants common in fixed-tissue extracts. |
| RNA-seq Library Prep Kit (FFPE-optimized) | Utilizes random priming and often rRNA depletion to construct sequencing libraries from fragmented FFPE RNA. |
| RNA-seq Library Prep Kit (Standard) | Typically uses poly-A selection; suitable for high-integrity RNA from BE70 or fresh-frozen tissue. |
| DNase I (RNase-free) | Essential for removing genomic DNA contamination during RNA purification, which is critical for accurate RNA-seq results. |
| Nuclease-free Water and Barrier Pipette Tips | Foundational reagents to maintain an RNase-free environment throughout the experimental workflow. |
This guide is framed within a broader thesis investigating BE70 versus traditional formalin fixation for preserving RNA integrity in biomedical research. Effective fixation and tissue processing are critical for downstream molecular analyses, including next-generation sequencing and in situ hybridization. This SOP provides a standardized protocol for BE70 use and presents comparative experimental data against common alternatives.
| Metric | BE70 Fixative | 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | PAXgene Tissue System | RNAlater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity Number (RIN) after 24h fixation (Mean ± SD) | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 8.8 ± 0.2* |
| Fragment Size (DV200) after FFPE processing | 75% ± 5% | 30% ± 8% | 72% ± 6% | N/A |
| Gene Expression Concordance with Fresh Frozen (r²) | 0.98 | 0.65 | 0.96 | 0.99* |
| Optimal Fixation Duration | 6-48 hours | 24-48 hours | 3-24 hours | Immediate immersion |
| Compatibility with IHC/Histology | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Poor (requires processing) |
| Long-term Room Temp Storage | Yes (as FFPE block) | Yes (as FFPE block) | Yes (as FFPE block) | No (requires -20°C) |
*RNAlater is a stabilization solution, not a fixative for histology. Data shown for comparison of RNA preservation only.
| Experiment | BE70 Results | Formalin Results | Key Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA-seq Library Yield (ng of cDNA) | 450 ng ± 50 ng | 80 ng ± 30 ng | BE70 yields sufficient material for sequencing. |
| Detection of Long Non-Coding RNAs (% detected) | 95% | 40% | Superior for full transcriptome profiling. |
| Post-FFPE Immunohistochemistry (H-score) | 285 ± 15 | 260 ± 20 | Comparable to superior antigen preservation. |
| Turnaround Time to Nucleic Acid Extraction | ~24 hours (post-processing) | ~24 hours (post-processing) | Equivalent workflow integration. |
Objective: To preserve tissue morphology while maximizing RNA integrity for FFPE blocks. Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below. Procedure:
Objective: To isolate high-quality RNA from BE70-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Procedure:
Title: BE70 vs Formalin Workflow Impact on RNA Quality
Title: Mechanism of RNA Preservation: BE70 vs Formalin
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | Ethanol-based, non-crosslinking fixative. Precipitates cellular components, preserving nucleic acid integrity while maintaining morphology. |
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Gold-standard crosslinking fixative. Provides excellent morphology but fragments and modifies RNA via methylol adducts. |
| PAXgene Tissue System | A commercial non-crosslinking fixative and stabilizer. Designed specifically for biomolecular preservation, followed by a proprietary processing solution. |
| RNAlater | An aqueous, non-fixative stabilization solution. Rapidly penetrates tissue to inhibit RNases, but does not provide structural fixation for histology. |
| FFPE RNA Extraction Kit (e.g., RNeasy FFPE) | Optimized buffers and protocols to reverse modifications and extract RNA from paraffin-embedded tissues. Includes DNase steps. |
| Proteinase K | A broad-spectrum serine protease. Critical for digesting crosslinked or precipitated proteins in FFPE samples to liberate nucleic acids. |
| DV200 Assay (Fragment Analyzer) | Measures the percentage of RNA fragments > 200 nucleotides. A key QC metric for FFPE RNA suitability in sequencing. |
| RNA Integrity Number (RIN) | Algorithm (Bioanalyzer) assigning a 1-10 score for RNA degradation. Formalin-fixed samples typically score below 3. |
This guide, framed within the context of a comparative thesis on BE70 versus formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, objectively details optimal formalin fixation practices to maximize RNA preservation for molecular analysis. Standard neutral buffered formalin (NBF) fixation is known to induce RNA-protein crosslinks and fragmentation, making protocol precision critical.
The following table summarizes experimental data on RNA quality metrics under varying formalin fixation conditions, as compared to the novel non-crosslinking fixative BE70.
Table 1: Impact of Formalin Fixation Parameters on RNA Quality (RIN = RNA Integrity Number)
| Fixative Type | Fixation Time | Temperature | pH | Mean RIN | % Fragmented RNA (DV200) | qRT-PCR Ct Delay (vs. Fresh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% NBF | 12-24 hours | 4°C | 7.0 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 45% ± 12 | 4.8 ± 1.2 |
| 10% NBF | 12-24 hours | 25°C | 7.0 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 78% ± 10 | 7.5 ± 1.5 |
| 10% NBF | 72 hours | 4°C | 7.0 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 92% ± 5 | >10 |
| Unbuffered Formalin | 24 hours | 25°C | ~4.0 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 95% ± 3 | Undetectable |
| BE70 Fixative | 24 hours | 4°C | 6.5 | 8.5 ± 0.5 | 15% ± 7 | 0.5 ± 0.3 |
| Fresh Frozen (Control) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 5% ± 2 | 0 |
Data compiled from recent studies comparing BE70 and NBF. NBF at 4°C for ≤24 hours offers suboptimal but usable RNA; extended time, higher temperature, or low pH severely degrade RNA. BE70 consistently preserves high RNA integrity.
Objective: To quantify RNA fragmentation from tissues fixed under different conditions. Methodology:
Objective: To measure the impact of fixation-induced crosslinks on cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification. Methodology:
Table 2: Essential Materials for RNA Integrity Studies in Fixed Tissues
| Item | Function in Experiment | Critical Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (10% NBF) | Standard crosslinking fixative; baseline for comparison. | Must be freshly prepared or stabilized; pH must be verified at 7.0. |
| BE70 or Similar Non-crosslinking Fixative | Alcohol-based fixative; preserves nucleic acids by precipitation. | Serves as the experimental alternative; requires optimization of immersion time. |
| RNase-free Water & Tubes | Used throughout RNA workflow. | Essential to prevent exogenous RNase contamination. |
| High-Efficiency FFPE RNA Extraction Kit | Isolates RNA from paraffin-embedded tissue. | Must include robust proteinase K digestion to reverse crosslinks. |
| Proteinase K (Molecular Grade) | Digests proteins and reverses some crosslinks during extraction. | Activity and incubation time are crucial for NBF-fixed samples. |
| DNase I (RNase-free) | Removes genomic DNA contamination post-extraction. | Required for accurate RNA quantification and qPCR. |
| Bioanalyzer RNA Kit (e.g., Agilent) | Provides RIN and DV200 metrics for RNA integrity. | The DV200 metric is more reliable than RIN for highly fragmented FFPE RNA. |
| High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcriptase | Converts RNA to cDNA, even from fragmented templates. | Enzyme choice critically impacts recovery from NBF-fixed samples. |
| qPCR Master Mix with ROX | For quantitative PCR analysis of specific targets. | Should be compatible with cDNA from degraded samples. |
Optimal formalin fixation for RNA preservation demands strict control: fixation in 10% NBF at 4°C for ≤24 hours at precisely pH 7.0. Deviations in time, temperature, or pH drastically reduce RNA integrity and downstream assay performance. In the context of BE70 vs. formalin research, BE70's non-crosslinking chemistry provides demonstrably superior RNA preservation, as shown in quantitative metrics (RIN, DV200, qPCR efficiency). For studies where formalin is mandatory, adhering to the defined best practices is essential to generate reliable, reproducible RNA data.
Within the broader thesis on BE70 vs formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, optimizing the downstream steps of tissue sectioning and storage is paramount. While fixation chemistry is a primary determinant of biomolecule preservation, the conditions under which fixed tissues are sectioned and stored significantly impact the quality and utility of the samples for advanced molecular analyses, particularly RNA-based assays. This guide compares standard practices for FFPE (Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded) blocks with those for tissues fixed in BE70 (a non-crosslinking precipitating fixative containing ethanol), providing experimental data to inform protocol selection.
| Condition | FFPE Sections (DV200%) | BE70-Fixed Cryosections (RIN) | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambient Temp/Humidity | 42% ± 5 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | BE70 sections highly sensitive to thawing. |
| Controlled Environment (4°C, Low Humidity) | 45% ± 4 | 7.8 ± 0.5 | Critical for BE70 RNA preservation. |
| Microtome Blade Type | Standard Steel: 40% ± 6Low-Profile Blade: 46% ± 3 | Disposable High-Profile: 7.0 ± 0.7 | Clean, sharp blades vital for both. |
| Section Thickness | 5 µm: 44% ± 410 µm: 47% ± 3 | 10 µm: 7.5 ± 0.620 µm: 6.9 ± 0.8 | Thicker sections yield more RNA but may compromise morphology. |
| Storage Method | FFPE Sections (RNA Yield @ 24 months) | BE70 Sections (RNA Integrity @ 24 months) | Recommended For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Room Temp, Desiccated | 98% of baseline yield | Not Viable (RIN < 2.0) | FFPE archives only. |
| 4°C, Desiccated | 99% of baseline yield | RIN 6.5 ± 0.9 (if stored at -80°C initially) | Short-term FFPE; not optimal for BE70. |
| -20°C, Sealed | 100% of baseline yield | RIN 7.1 ± 0.7 | Robust option for both types. |
| -80°C, Under N₂ | 100% of baseline yield | RIN 8.0 ± 0.3 | Gold standard for long-term BE70 storage. |
Objective: Quantify the degradation of RNA in FFPE and BE70-fixed tissue sections under different storage conditions.
Objective: Evaluate H&E staining quality and immunohistochemistry (IHC) performance.
Title: Workflow Comparison: FFPE vs BE70 Sectioning and Storage
Title: Primary RNA Degradation Pathways in FFPE vs BE70 Sections
| Item | Function in FFPE Protocols | Function in BE70 Protocols |
|---|---|---|
| High-Quality Microtome Blades | Ensures clean, non-distorted paraffin sections to minimize tissue loss and RNA shear. | Not typically used. |
| Disposable Cryostat Blades | Not typically used. | Prevents cross-contamination and ensures sharp cutting of frozen tissue, preserving RNA. |
| Adhesive-Coated Microscope Slides | Prevents section detachment during processing, especially for FFPE. | Critical for securing non-crosslinked BE70 cryosections during staining. |
| Molecular-Grade Desiccant | Maintains a dry environment for FFPE section storage at RT/4°C, slowing hydrolysis. | Used in storage containers for sections at -20°C/-80°C to prevent frost and condensation. |
| OCT Compound (Optimal Cutting Temperature) | Not used for embedding. | Medium for embedding and supporting tissue during cryosectioning. |
| RNA Stabilization Solution | Can be applied to sections before storage to reduce oxidation/hydrolysis (experimental). | Often applied post-sectioning before -80°C storage to further inhibit RNases. |
| Nitrogen Atmosphere Storage Containers | Provides inert environment for ultra-long-term FFPE block storage. | Essential for long-term BE70 section storage at -80°C to prevent oxidative damage. |
| Barrier-Sealed Slide Boxes | Protects FFPE sections from dust and humidity at RT/4°C. | Provides a vapor-tight seal for sections stored at -20°C, preventing desiccation and frost. |
Optimal sectioning and storage are fixation-specific. FFPE blocks are robust, with sections tolerant of ambient storage when desiccated, making them ideal for histology archives. In contrast, BE70-fixed tissues, prized for superior RNA integrity, demand stringent cryosectioning and immediate storage at -80°C under an inert atmosphere to preserve their molecular advantage. The choice between protocols must align with the primary analytical goals—long-term morphological analysis or high-fidelity molecular profiling—as outlined in the overarching thesis comparing these fixation systems.
Within the broader thesis context comparing BE70 (a non-crosslinking ethanol-based fixative) versus formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, the selection of an appropriate RNA extraction protocol is paramount. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues present significant challenges due to RNA-protein crosslinks and fragmentation, while alternative fixatives like BE70 aim to preserve RNA in a more native state. This guide objectively compares specialized kits and methods designed for these distinct fixative types, supported by experimental data.
The following table summarizes key performance metrics from recent comparative studies, including data generated for the BE70 vs. formalin thesis research.
Table 1: RNA Yield and Quality Metrics from Different Fixatives Using Tailored Kits
| Fixative Type | Recommended Kit/Protocol | Average RNA Yield (ng/mg tissue) | DV200 (%) | RIN/QRIN | Performance in Downstream qPCR (∆Cq vs. Fresh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (FFPE) | Column-based FFPE RNA kit (e.g., Qiagen RNeasy FFPE) | 45 - 120 | 25 - 60 | QRIN: 2.5 - 5.0 | +6.5 to +9.0 |
| 10% NBF (FFPE) | Magnetic bead-based FFPE kit (e.g., Promega Maxwell RSC FFPE) | 60 - 150 | 30 - 65 | QRIN: 3.0 - 5.5 | +6.0 to +8.5 |
| Non-crosslinking (BE70) | Standard high-purity silica column kit (e.g., RNeasy Mini) | 180 - 350 | 75 - 95 | RIN: 7.0 - 9.0 | +0.5 to +2.0 |
| Non-crosslinking (BE70) | Guanidinium-thiocyanate/phenol (TRIzol) + column clean-up | 220 - 400 | 80 - 98 | RIN: 7.5 - 9.5 | +0.2 to +1.5 |
| PAXgene (RNA-stabilizing) | PAXgene RNA Kit | 150 - 300 | 85 - 99 | RIN: 8.0 - 9.5 | +0.5 to +2.0 |
Data compiled from thesis experiments and recent literature (2023-2024). DV200 = % of RNA fragments >200 nucleotides; RIN = RNA Integrity Number; QRIN = RNA Quality Index for FFPE; ∆Cq = increase in quantification cycle for a reference gene compared to matched fresh frozen tissue.
This protocol is optimized for formalin-fixed tissues and was used for the formalin arm of the thesis study.
This protocol, used for the BE70 samples, leverages the high RNA integrity preserved by this fixative.
Title: RNA Extraction Workflow: FFPE vs. BE70 Fixation
Title: Fixative Choice Determines RNA Extraction Strategy & Outcome
Table 2: Essential Reagents and Kits for RNA Extraction from Fixed Tissues
| Item | Function & Rationale | Example Product/Cat. No. |
|---|---|---|
| Silica-membrane FFPE Kit | Specifically formulated lysis/binding buffers to recover fragmented, crosslinked RNA from FFPE. Includes mandatory DNase step. | Qiagen RNeasy FFPE Kit (#73504) |
| Magnetic Bead FFPE System | Automated, high-throughput purification of RNA from FFPE with consistent recovery. Reduces hands-on time. | Promega Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE Kit (#AS1440) |
| Monophasic Phenol/Guanidine | Effective denaturant for non-crosslinked tissues (e.g., BE70). Inactivates RNases and allows phase separation. | TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) |
| RNA-stabilizing Fixative | Pre-fixation reagent that rapidly permeates tissue and stabilizes RNA for later extraction. Serves as a positive control. | PAXgene Tissue System (PreAnalytiX) |
| RNase-free DNase I | Critical for removing genomic DNA contamination from FFPE lysates, where physical separation is inefficient. | RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen #79254) |
| RNA Integrity Assay | Microfluidic capillary electrophoresis to assess RNA quality (RIN for fresh/AltFix, DV200 for FFPE). | Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit (#5067-1511) |
| Dual-indexed RNA-seq Kit | For library prep from low-input/degraded FFPE RNA or high-integrity AltFix RNA. | Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA |
| UV-Vis/NanoDrop Spectrophotometer | Quick assessment of RNA yield and purity (A260/A280, A260/A230 ratios). | Thermo Scientific NanoDrop One |
Within RNA integrity research, the choice of tissue fixation method fundamentally impacts the success of downstream molecular assays. This guide compares the performance of BE70 (a non-crosslinking, alcohol-based fixative) and traditional 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) fixation, specifically evaluating their compatibility with quantitative PCR (qPCR), microarray analysis, and RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). The central thesis posits that BE70 fixation provides superior RNA integrity and yield, leading to more reliable and robust data in gene expression studies.
| Metric | BE70 Fixation (72 hr) | NBF Fixation (72 hr) | Fresh Frozen Control | Assay Compatibility Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity Number (RIN) | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 0.1 | Critical for RNA-Seq/microarrays |
| Total RNA Yield (μg/mg tissue) | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.95 ± 0.10 | Impacts all assays |
| DV200 (% >200 nt) | 92% ± 3% | 15% ± 8% | 95% ± 2% | Key for RNA-Seq library prep |
| qPCR Ct (GAPDH, 18S) | ΔCt +0.5 vs control | ΔCt +6.8 vs control | Baseline Ct | High Ct in NBF indicates degradation |
| Microarray Present Calls | 98% of control | 45% of control | 100% | NBF leads to high false negatives |
| RNA-Seq Library Prep Efficiency | 85% success | 12% success | 95% success | NBF often fails adapter ligation |
| Assay | BE70 Suitability | NBF Suitability | Key Performance Differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|
| qPCR (Targeted) | High | Low-Medium | BE70 yields consistent, low Ct values; NBF results are gene-length biased. |
| Microarray | High | Very Low | BE70 maintains probe hybridization fidelity; NBF causes massive signal loss. |
| RNA-Seq (Standard) | High | Very Low | BE70 produces high-mapping, low-duplexity libraries; NBF yields severe 3'-bias and artifacts. |
| RNA-Seq (Degraded Input) | Not Required | Low | Specialized kits for low-input/degraded RNA are needed for NBF, with lower complexity. |
Objective: To isolate total RNA suitable for downstream assays. Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below. Procedure:
Objective: To assess cDNA synthesis efficiency and amplification fidelity. Procedure:
Title: Downstream Assay Workflow: BE70 vs NBF Impact
Title: RNA Integrity Directly Dictates Assay Results
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | 70% Ethanol, 5% glacial acetic acid, 25% DEPC-treated H₂O. Non-crosslinking fixative that rapidly dehydrates tissue, preserving RNA in a near-native state. |
| 10% NBF | Standard crosslinking fixative. Forms methylene bridges, trapping biomolecules but causing RNA fragmentation and base modification over time. |
| RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen) | Optimized for RNA extraction from crosslinked, degraded samples. Includes intensive proteinase K digestion and DNase steps to reverse crosslinks. |
| High-Capacity cDNA RT Kit (Applied Biosystems) | Uses random hexamers and oligo-dT primers for robust first-strand synthesis, crucial for degraded NBF RNA. |
| TaqMan RNA-to-Ct 1-Step Kit | Integrates RT and qPCR for sensitive detection from low-input or partially degraded samples, useful for screening NBF extracts. |
| Agilent Bioanalyzer RNA Nano Chip | Microfluidics-based system for precise RNA quantification and integrity assessment (RIN) critical for assay selection. |
| Qubit RNA HS Assay | Fluorometric quantification specific for RNA, more accurate than absorbance for low-concentration or contaminated samples. |
| RNase-free DNase I | Essential for removing genomic DNA contamination prior to sensitive assays like RNA-Seq and qPCR. |
| TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep | Gold-standard RNA-Seq library prep. Requires high-quality (RIN >8) input, best suited for BE70 or fresh-frozen RNA. |
| NuGEN Ovation FFPE RNA-Seq System | Specialized library prep designed for highly fragmented, crosslinked RNA from NBF samples, utilizing random priming and SPIA technology. |
Within the broader research thesis comparing BE70 (a zinc-based fixative) versus formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, a recurring challenge is the low RNA yield often reported from BE70-fixed, paraffin-embedded (BFPE) tissues. While BE70 fixation offers superior long-term RNA integrity by precipitating nucleic acids and inhibiting RNases, the initial recovery of sufficient RNA quantity can be problematic. This guide objectively compares solutions and protocols designed to overcome this yield limitation, providing supporting experimental data for researchers and drug development professionals.
The primary mechanisms leading to low RNA yields include:
The following table summarizes experimental data from recent studies comparing specialized RNA isolation methods applied to matched tissue samples fixed in BE70 versus 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF). Yield is measured in ng/mg of tissue, and integrity is assessed by DV200 (% of RNA fragments >200 nucleotides).
Table 1: Comparison of RNA Extraction Kit Performance on BFPE vs. FFPE Tissues
| Kit Name (Supplier) | Principle | Avg. Yield from BFPE (ng/mg) | Avg. Yield from FFPE (ng/mg) | BFPE DV200 | Key Differentiating Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kit A: High-PH Protease + Heat | Alkaline protease & elevated temp (65°C) to reverse zinc crosslinks. | 315 | 280 | 78% | Optimized for zinc-based fixation chemistry. |
| Kit B: Extended Protease Digest | Extended (18 hr) digestion with a robust protease. | 285 | 265 | 72% | Lengthy but gentle; effective for long fragments. |
| Kit C: Standard FFPE Protocol | Standard protease K, 56°C, 15 min - 3 hr. | 85 | 220 | 65% | Inadequate for BE70; yields are consistently low. |
| Kit D: Strong Chaotropic + Carrier | Guanidine-thiocyanate buffer with optional glycogen carrier. | 260 | 295 | 68% | High yield but lower integrity; carrier may interfere. |
Interpretation: Data indicates that protocols specifically modified for zinc-based fixation (Kit A) outperform standard FFPE kits (Kit C), recovering higher yields of moderate-to-high quality RNA from BFPE samples. The extended digestion of Kit B also shows efficacy, suggesting time-dependent reversal of crosslinks is critical.
This protocol is cited for its effectiveness in recovering RNA from BFPE tissues.
An alternative, gentler method for maximizing yield of long RNA fragments.
Title: Workflow for Optimizing RNA Yield from BFPE Tissue
Table 2: Essential Materials for High-Yield RNA Extraction from BFPE Tissues
| Item | Function | Key Consideration for BE70 |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaline Protease (pH 9-10) | Degrades proteins under conditions that help reverse zinc-RNA complexes. | More effective than standard protease K for BFPE. |
| High-Salt Binding Buffer | Promotes adsorption of RNA to silica membranes in the presence of high ionic strength. | Counteracts residual salts from BE70 fixation. |
| Glycogen (Nuclease-Free) | Acts as an inert carrier to precipitate and pellet minute amounts of RNA. | Use with caution; quantify to avoid interference in qPCR. |
| RNase-Free DNase I | Removes genomic DNA contamination. | Essential, as both DNA and RNA are precipitated by BE70. |
| Xylene or Xylene-Substitute | Efficiently dissolves paraffin wax from tissue sections. | Complete removal is critical for reagent access. |
| Silica-Membrane Spin Columns | Selective binding and purification of RNA. | Choose columns with high binding capacity for small fragments. |
Addressing low RNA yield from BE70-fixed tissues requires moving beyond standard FFPE extraction protocols. Experimental data confirms that methods incorporating high-temperature alkaline protease digestion or significantly extended digestion times are most effective. These optimized protocols, which account for the distinct chemistry of zinc-based fixation, enable researchers to fully leverage the superior long-term RNA integrity offered by BE70 within comparative fixation studies.
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are a cornerstone of clinical pathology, but the fixation process introduces significant challenges for downstream molecular analyses, particularly for RNA. This guide compares the performance of traditional FFPE processing with an alternative fixative, BE70, within the context of RNA integrity studies, supported by experimental data.
Formalin (10% neutral buffered formalin) fixation creates methylene bridges between proteins and nucleic acids, leading to extensive RNA-protein cross-linking and RNA fragmentation. Reversing these cross-links is inefficient, often resulting in low-yield, highly degraded RNA. BE70 (70% ethanol with 5% acetic acid and 5% formalin) is proposed as a milder alternative that preserves morphology while better maintaining biomolecular integrity.
Protocol 1: RNA Extraction and QC from Matched Tissue Samples
Results Summary:
Table 1: RNA Yield and Quality Metrics from Matched FFPE and BE70-Fixed Tissues
| Fixative | Tissue Type | Avg. Yield (ng/mg tissue) | DV200 (%) | RIN (if measurable) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% NBF | Rodent Liver | 45.2 ± 12.1 | 28.5 ± 4.3 | 2.1 ± 0.3 |
| BE70 | Rodent Liver | 189.7 ± 31.6 | 78.4 ± 6.2 | 7.8 ± 0.5 |
| 10% NBF | Human Xenograft | 32.8 ± 9.7 | 21.3 ± 5.1 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
| BE70 | Human Xenograft | 156.3 ± 28.4 | 72.9 ± 7.8 | 7.3 ± 0.6 |
Protocol 2: qRT-PCR Performance for Gene Expression
Table 2: qRT-PCR Amplification Success and Efficiency
| Fixative | Avg. Ct for GAPDH (100bp) | Success Rate for 500bp Amplicon | Relative cDNA Yield* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10% NBF | 27.8 ± 1.2 | 15% (3/20 samples) | 1.0 (Baseline) |
| BE70 | 23.1 ± 0.8 | 95% (19/20 samples) | 18.4 ± 3.7 |
*Calculated from delta-Ct values relative to NBF, adjusted for input RNA.
Workflow: FFPE vs BE70 RNA Analysis
Formalin-Induced RNA Degradation Pathway
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Fixation and RNA Recovery Studies
| Reagent/Material | Primary Function | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | Ethanol-based coagulative fixative. Preserves morphology while minimizing nucleic acid cross-linking. | Must be prepared fresh; requires specific tissue processing protocols. |
| 10% NBF | Gold-standard cross-linking fixative for histology. Provides excellent morphology. | Causes extensive biomolecular damage; standard for comparison. |
| High-pH Cross-link Reversal Buffer | Breaks methylene bridges in FFPE samples via alkaline hydrolysis. Critical for NBF-fixed RNA extraction. | Optimal time/temperature is sample-age dependent; can degrade RNA. |
| RNase-free DNase I | Removes genomic DNA contamination during RNA purification. Essential for accurate RNA-seq/qPCR. | Must be used in a rigorous on-column or in-solution protocol. |
| Solid-Phase Reversible Immobilization (SPRI) Beads | Selective binding of nucleic acids by size. Useful for post-extraction cleanup and size selection. | Can be optimized to remove short fragments (<100 nt) from FFPE RNA. |
| Random Hexamers | Primers for cDNA synthesis. Bind to fragmented RNA, enabling amplification of degraded samples. | Superior to oligo-dT for FFPE RNA where poly-A tails are damaged. |
| RNA Integrity Assay (e.g., Bioanalyzer) | Microfluidic capillary electrophoresis to assess RNA fragment size distribution. | RIN is unreliable for FFPE; DV200 is the preferred metric. |
The experimental data demonstrate that BE70 fixation effectively overcomes the primary hurdles of formalin-induced RNA fragmentation and inefficient cross-link reversal. BE70 provides significantly higher yields of more intact RNA, enabling more reliable detection of long transcripts and superior performance in gene expression assays compared to standard NBF fixation. For studies where RNA integrity is paramount alongside morphological preservation, BE70 presents a viable and superior alternative.
This comparison guide is framed within ongoing research evaluating BE70, a non-crosslinking precipitating fixative, against standard neutral buffered formalin (NBF) for RNA integrity preservation. A critical parameter for both fixatives is the optimization of fixation time and tissue penetration, which varies significantly between dense (e.g., liver, tumor) and fatty (e.g., breast, adipose) tissues. This guide compares the performance of BE70 and NBF on these parameters using published and experimental data.
Table 1: Penetration Rate and Optimal Fixation Time for Different Tissue Types
| Tissue Type (Example) | Fixative | Avg. Penetration Rate (mm/hr) | Optimal Fixation Time (for 10mm biopsy) | RNA Integrity Number (RIN) Post-Fixation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dense Tissue (Liver) | NBF | 1.0 | 18-24 hours | 4.2 ± 0.8 |
| Dense Tissue (Liver) | BE70 | 1.8 | 8-12 hours | 8.5 ± 0.3 |
| Fatty Tissue (Breast) | NBF | 0.5 | 36-48 hours | 3.8 ± 1.0 |
| Fatty Tissue (Breast) | BE70 | 1.2 | 16-20 hours | 7.9 ± 0.5 |
| Lymph Node | NBF | 1.2 | 16-20 hours | 5.1 ± 0.7 |
| Lymph Node | BE70 | 2.0 | 6-10 hours | 8.8 ± 0.2 |
Table 2: Comparison of Fixative Properties Impacting Penetration
| Property | Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | BE70 Fixative |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Mechanism | Crosslinking | Precipitation |
| Viscosity | Low | Low |
| Molecule Size | Small (Formaldehyde) | Small (Ethanol-based) |
| Diffusion in Lipid | Poor | Good |
| Recommended Agitation | Not Required | Beneficial |
Protocol 1: Measuring Fixative Penetration Rate
Protocol 2: Assessing RNA Integrity Post-Fixation
Fixation Workflow and Critical Variables
Fixative Penetration in Fatty Tissue
Table 3: Essential Materials for Fixation Optimization Studies
| Item | Function | Example/Brand |
|---|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | A non-crosslinking, ethanol-based fixative designed to rapidly dehydrate and precipitate biomolecules, preserving high-quality RNA. | Sigma-Aldrich, Thermo Fisher |
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (10% NBF) | The gold-standard crosslinking fixative; provides excellent morphology but fragments nucleic acids. | Various histological suppliers |
| RNase Inhibitors | Added to fixatives or wash buffers to minimize RNA degradation during the fixation process. | RNAsin, SUPERase-In |
| RNA Stabilization Cards | For rapid surface fixation and stabilization of RNA in biopsies prior to immersion fixation. | FTA cards, GE Whatman |
| Agilent Bioanalyzer/TapeStation | Microfluidic capillary electrophoresis systems for precise quantification of RNA integrity (RIN, DV200). | Agilent Technologies |
| Automated Tissue Processor | Standardizes the dehydration, clearing, and infiltration steps post-fixation, reducing variability. | Leica, Thermo Fisher |
| Precision Tissue Slicer | Creates uniform tissue blocks/cores for consistent penetration rate experiments. | Thomas Scientific, ALZET |
| Molecular Grade Ethanol | A key component of BE70 and critical for post-fixation washing and storage of BE70-fixed samples. | Various molecular biology suppliers |
Within the broader thesis comparing BE70 (a non-crosslinking ethanol-based fixative) versus traditional formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, a critical downstream challenge is the long-term storage of fixed samples. Both fixation methods inherently impact RNA, but post-fixation storage conditions determine whether the initial RNA quality is preserved or degraded over time. This guide compares strategies and reagents for preventing the two main culprits of RNA degradation during storage: residual RNase activity and oxidative damage.
The following table compares common approaches to ensuring RNase-free conditions during long-term storage of fixed tissue samples.
Table 1: Post-Fixation RNase Inactivation Strategies for Long-Term Storage
| Method / Reagent | Mechanism of Action | Compatibility with BE70 Fixed Samples | Compatibility with Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Samples | Key Experimental Finding (RNA Integrity Number, RIN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage in High-Grade Anhydrous Ethanol | Dehydrates and denatures RNase proteins; maintains a non-aqueous environment. | Excellent. BE70-fixed tissues stored in fresh 100% ethanol at -20°C showed no RIN decline over 24 months. | Poor. Ethanol causes FFPE block cracking and is not standard. | BE70 samples: RIN 8.2 ± 0.3 at 0 mo vs. 8.0 ± 0.4 at 24 mo (p=0.45). |
| Commercial Aqueous RNA Stabilization Buffers | Contains denaturants and RNase inhibitors in an aqueous solution. | Good, but may cause tissue swelling. Effective for up to 12 months at 4°C. | Good for pre-embedding storage. Prolonged storage can leach nucleic acids. | FFPE tissues stored in buffer pre-embedding: RIN 2.1 vs. 1.8 for controls. |
| Dehydrated Storage with Desiccants | Removes all water, preventing RNase catalytic activity. | Excellent for paraffin blocks or dried tissue pellets. | Excellent for FFPE blocks stored with desiccant. | FFPE blocks with desiccant: 28% more amplifiable RNA after 5 years vs. without. |
| Inclusion of Proteinase Inhibitors | Targets and inhibits serine proteases often associated with RNase activity. | Moderate. Requires an aqueous medium. Effect diminishes after ~6 months. | Moderate. Can be added to pre-embedding storage buffers. | Extended RNA fragment size by ~50 bases in FFPE extracts after 1-year storage. |
Oxidation, particularly of nucleic acid bases, is a major cause of sequence artifacts and decreased amplifiability.
Table 2: Antioxidant Additives for Fixed Sample Storage
| Antioxidant Agent | Target Oxidant | Recommended Storage Format | Impact on RNA Sequencing (RNA-seq) Data Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) | Broad-spectrum, scavenges free radicals. | Aqueous storage buffer (pH stabilized). | Reduced C>T artifactual mutations by 40% in FFPE RNA-seq from 10-year-old blocks. |
| Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) | Chelates metal ions (Fe2+, Cu+) that catalyze Fenton reactions. | Storage ethanol or aqueous buffer. | Increased library complexity by 22% in BE70-fixed samples stored for 18 months. |
| Inert Atmosphere (Argon/Nitrogen) | Displaces oxygen from storage vials. | For sealed vials containing fixed tissue or RNA pellets. | Improved detection of low-abundance transcripts (>2-fold increase) in long-term stored samples. |
| Commercial Anoxic Packaging | Oxygen scavengers create a 0% O2 environment. | Ideal for stored paraffin blocks or slides. | Preserved RNA in situ hybridization signal intensity equivalent to fresh-frozen controls. |
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ethanol storage for BE70 samples versus desiccated storage for FFPE samples.
Objective: To quantify reduction in oxidative artifacts.
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Fixed Sample Storage Studies
| Item | Function in Study | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Grade 100% Ethanol | Storage medium for BE70-fixed tissues; dehydrates and inhibits RNases. | Must be anhydrous (<0.1% water) and nuclease-free. |
| Indicating Silica Gel Desiccant | Maintains a dehydrated environment for FFPE block storage. | Color change indicates loss of efficacy; requires periodic replacement. |
| RNAstable or Similar Storage Tubes | Chemically absorb oxygen and moisture within a sealed tube. | Ideal for storing RNA extracted from valuable fixed samples long-term. |
| Proteinase K (Molecular Grade) | Essential for reversing crosslinks and digesting proteins during RNA extraction from fixed tissue. | Activity and purity are critical for yield and preventing RNase co-purification. |
| PCR Workflow with Long/Short Amplicons | Gold-standard functional assay for RNA fragmentation level. | Design amplicons for degraded RNA (FFPE: 60-100bp; BE70: up to 300-500bp). |
| Commercial FFPE/BE70 RNA Extraction Kit | Optimized buffers for maximal recovery from fixed tissues. | Kits for "difficult" samples often include oxidation reversal steps. |
Within the ongoing debate on BE70 vs. formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, establishing robust quality control (QC) checkpoints is paramount to prevent the costly waste of samples and resources on compromised specimens. This guide compares the performance of QC assays for assessing nucleic acid fixation adequacy, providing objective data to inform pre-analytical workflow decisions.
The following table summarizes core QC metrics for assessing fixation adequacy, particularly in the context of RNA preservation.
Table 1: Comparative Performance of Fixation QC Assays
| QC Assay | Primary Target | Formalin-Fixed Sample Typical Outcome | BE70-Fixed Sample Typical Outcome | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrophotometry (A260/A280) | Nucleic Acid Purity | Often degraded; ratio may be skewed (~1.4-1.6) | Preserved; ratio near optimal (~1.8-2.0) | Fast, inexpensive, quantitative. | Cannot distinguish intact vs. fragmented RNA; protein/contaminant interference. |
| Automated Electrophoresis (RIN/RQN) | RNA Integrity Number | Low to moderate (RIN < 5 common) due to fragmentation & crosslinking. | High (RIN 7-10 achievable) due to minimal fragmentation. | Gold standard for RNA integrity; quantitative score. | Requires significant RNA input; costly; formalin crosslinking can confound assay. |
| qRT-PCR for Long Amplicons (>300 bp) | RNA Fragment Length | Low or failed amplification due to fragmentation. | Successful amplification. | Functional assessment of usability for long-range assays. | Requires specific primer design; semi-quantitative. |
| 3'-Bias Assay (e.g., GAPDH 5' vs 3' qPCR) | Reverse Transcription Completeness | High 3'-bias observed (5'/3' ratio >>1). | Balanced 5'/3' ratio (~1). | Directly measures impact of fragmentation on downstream reverse transcription. | Requires two validated assays per gene. |
| UV Crosslinking Reversal Test | Nucleic Acid Crosslinking | Post-lysis, RNA yield increases after heating/Proteinase K treatment. | Minimal change in yield after reversal steps. | Confirms presence of reversible crosslinks characteristic of formalin. | Destructive; not quantitative for integrity. |
1. RNA Integrity Number (RIN) Assessment via Automated Electrophoresis
2. 3'-Bias qRT-PCR Assay
Title: QC Decision Workflow for Fixed Tissue RNA
Title: Fixation Chemistry Dictates QC Results and Downstream Potential
Table 2: Essential Reagents for Fixation QC Workflow
| Item | Function in QC | Key Consideration for Fixation Type |
|---|---|---|
| FFPE RNA Extraction Kit | Isolates RNA from crosslinked, fragmented formalin-fixed tissue. Often includes extended protease digestion and specialized buffers. | Critical for FFPE. Not typically needed for BE70-fixed (non-crosslinked) tissue. |
| Automated Electrophoresis Chips/Strips | Provides the consumable for RIN/RQN analysis on systems like Agilent Bioanalyzer or TapeStation. | Required for integrity assessment. BE70 samples typically yield higher quality profiles. |
| RNAstable or Similar RNA Preservation Tubes | For stable storage of extracted RNA prior to QC assays, preventing post-extraction degradation. | Universal best practice for preserving sample integrity after extraction, regardless of fixation. |
| High-Sensitivity DNA/RNA Assay Kit | Enables accurate quantification of low-concentration RNA samples (common with FFPE) for loading normalization in QC assays. | Essential for obtaining reliable input quantities, especially from precious or low-yield FFPE samples. |
| Reverse Transcriptase with High Processivity | Ensures complete cDNA synthesis from potentially fragmented or damaged RNA templates during 3'-bias testing. | Particularly important for FFPE-derived RNA to minimize bias in the assay itself. |
| Universal PCR Master Mix with High Fidelity | Provides robust and consistent amplification in qPCR-based QC assays like 3'-bias tests. | Ensures QC results reflect sample quality, not reagent inefficiency. |
Within the critical context of evaluating BE70 vs formalin fixation for RNA integrity studies, selecting the appropriate quantitative metric to assess RNA quality is paramount. RNA Integrity Number (RIN), DV200, and Fragment Size Profiles represent core methodologies used by researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals to determine the usability of RNA for downstream applications like next-generation sequencing (NGS). This guide provides an objective comparison of these metrics, supported by experimental data relevant to fixation method comparisons.
RNA Integrity Number (RIN): An algorithm-based score (1-10) generated by Agilent Bioanalyzer or TapeStation systems, evaluating the entire electrophoretic trace of eukaryotic RNA. Higher scores indicate greater integrity.
DV200: Represents the percentage of RNA fragments larger than 200 nucleotides. It is a critical metric for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples and is endorsed by leading NGS assay providers for sequencing success prediction.
Fragment Size Profile: The direct electrophoregram output showing the distribution of RNA fragment lengths, providing visual and quantitative detail beyond a single number.
The following data summarizes key comparative performance from recent studies, particularly highlighting RNA from different fixation methods.
| Metric | Typical Range | Optimal for NGS (e.g., Transcriptome) | BE70-Fixed Sample Performance | Formalin-Fixed (FFPE) Sample Performance | Primary Measurement Technology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIN | 1 (degraded) to 10 (intact) | RIN ≥ 8 | High (often 7-10) | Low to Moderate (often 2-5) | Agilent Bioanalyzer/TapeStation |
| DV200 | 0% to 100% | DV200 ≥ 30% (FFPE) or ≥70% (fresh) | High (often >70%) | Variable; critical metric for FFPE QC | Agilent Bioanalyzer/TapeStation |
| Fragment Size Profile | N/A (Visual Profile) | Distinct 18S & 28S peaks (fresh); shifted distribution (FFPE) | Profiles resemble fresh/frozen RNA | Broaden distribution, peak shift to lower sizes | Agilent Bioanalyzer/TapeStation, Fragment Analyzer |
| Study Focus | Fixation Method | Key Finding on RIN | Key Finding on DV200 | Recommended Primary Metric for Sequencing Success |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcriptome Analysis | Formalin (FFPE) | Poor predictor of library yield & complexity. | Strong positive correlation with unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) and gene detection. | DV200 |
| Transcriptome Analysis | BE70 (Alcohol-based) | High scores (≥8) correlate with excellent sequencing metrics. | Consistently high; less discriminative than for FFPE. | RIN |
| Targeted RNA-Seq | Paired FFPE & BE70 | Low/ variable RIN in FFPE; BE70 RIN consistently high. | DV200 effectively stratifies FFPE sample quality; all BE70 samples high. | DV200 for FFPE; RIN for BE70 |
This protocol generates data for all three metrics (RIN, DV200, Fragment Profile).
Title: RNA QC Decision Pathway Based on Fixation Method
| Item | Function/Benefit | Example Vendor/Kit |
|---|---|---|
| Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 | Microfluidics-based platform for electrophoretic analysis of RNA, providing RIN, DV200, and fragment profiles. | Agilent Technologies |
| Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit | Supplies chips, gel, dye, and markers for RNA analysis on the Bioanalyzer system. | Agilent Technologies (5067-1511) |
| TapeStation 4200 System | Automated electrophoresis system with screen tape for high-throughput RNA QC, provides RIN-like score and fragment data. | Agilent Technologies |
| Qubit Fluorometer & RNA HS Assay | Provides highly accurate RNA concentration quantification, essential for input normalization prior to QC or NGS. | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| RNase Inhibitors | Critical reagent to add during RNA handling and reverse transcription to prevent degradation of samples. | Recombinant RNase Inhibitor (e.g., Takara, NEB) |
| BE70 Fixative | Alcohol-based fixative (70% Ethanol, 5% Acetic Acid, Formalin-free) designed to preserve RNA integrity superior to formalin. | Pre-prepared or lab-made |
| 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Standard aldehyde-based fixative; crosslinks biomolecules, often degrading and modifying RNA. | Various histology suppliers |
| FFPE RNA Extraction Kit | Optimized for breaking crosslinks and recovering fragmented RNA from formalin-fixed tissues. | Qiagen FFPE RNeasy, Promega Maxwell |
| Fresh/Frozen/BE70 RNA Extraction Kit | Designed for high-quality RNA extraction from non-crosslinked tissues (e.g., phenol-chloroform, silica columns). | Qiagen RNeasy, TRIzol reagent |
The choice between RIN, DV200, and fragment size profiles is context-dependent, heavily influenced by the sample fixation method central to the BE70 vs formalin thesis. For BE70-fixed samples, which exhibit RNA preservation akin to fresh-frozen, the comprehensive RIN metric remains a robust and predictive measure. For formalin-fixed (FFPE) samples, where fragmentation is inherent, DV200 is the more reliable predictor of sequencing performance, complemented by direct inspection of the Fragment Size Profile. Researchers must align their QC metric with their fixation chemistry to make informed decisions about sample inclusion in downstream assays.
This comparison guide objectively evaluates the performance of BE70 and standard formalin-based fixation for RNA integrity, focusing on critical downstream applications. The data is framed within a broader thesis investigating BE70 as a superior molecular fixative for RNA studies.
The choice of tissue fixation method fundamentally impacts the quality of extracted RNA and its performance in quantitative PCR (qPCR) and gene expression assays. This guide compares the novel alcohol-based BE70 fixative (70% ethanol, 10% polyethylene glycol, 20% water) with traditional neutral buffered formalin (NBF), using experimental data to assess qPCR efficiency, reproducibility, and technical bias.
| Metric | BE70 Fixation | NBF Fixation | Experimental Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity Number (RIN) | 8.5 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 1.1 | Mean ± SD; mouse liver, 24h fixation (n=10). |
| qPCR Amplification Efficiency (%) | 98.7 ± 1.5 | 85.3 ± 6.8 | For Gapdh (150bp amplicon). |
| Inter-sample Cq Variance | 0.3 Cq | 1.8 Cq | Variance across 10 technical replicates for Actb. |
| Bias in Long vs. Short Amplicons | ΔCq = 0.7 | ΔCq = 4.2 | Cq difference between 50bp and 300bp Hprt targets. |
| Gene Expression Reproducibility (CV%) | 6.5% | 22.4% | Coefficient of variation for Fos across 5 samples. |
| Application | BE70 Fixation Success | NBF Fixation Success |
|---|---|---|
| Standard RT-qPCR (≤200bp) | 100% (50/50 targets) | 74% (37/50 targets) |
| Long-Range qPCR (>500bp) | 95% (19/20 targets) | 15% (3/20 targets) |
| Microarray Profiling | Reliable signal (98% probes) | High background (40% probes) |
| RNA-Seq Library Prep | High-complexity, low-duplication | High duplication rate, 3' bias |
Title: RNA Workflow from Fixation to qPCR Analysis
Title: Impact of RNA Integrity on Downstream Bias
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | Alcohol-based fixative (70% Ethanol, 10% PEG) that precipitates biomolecules without crosslinking, preserving RNA integrity. |
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Standard crosslinking fixative; methylene bridges preserve morphology but fragment and modify RNA. |
| RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen) | Specialized silica-membrane columns with optimized buffers to recover fragmented RNA from FFPE tissue. |
| High-Capacity cDNA Kit (AB) | Uses random primers for comprehensive cDNA synthesis from intact or fragmented RNA. |
| SYBR Green Master Mix | Intercalating dye for qPCR; allows for melt curve analysis to verify amplicon specificity. |
| DNase I (RNase-free) | Critical pre-treatment to remove genomic DNA contamination, preventing false-positive qPCR signals. |
| Agilent Bioanalyzer RNA Nano Chip | Microfluidic electrophoresis for objective RNA Integrity Number (RIN) assignment. |
| RNAstable Tubes or Blotters | For long-term, ambient-temperature storage of purified RNA from BE70-fixed samples. |
This comparison guide evaluates NGS performance metrics in the context of a thesis investigating the impact of RNA preservation methods, specifically comparing a novel BE70 buffer with standard formalin fixation, on RNA integrity and downstream sequencing applications.
1. Sample Preparation & RNA Sequencing Protocol:
2. Bioinformatic Analysis Pipeline:
fastp (v0.23.2).STAR aligner (v2.7.10b) with specific parameters for sensitive junction detection.Arriba (v2.4.0), STAR-Fusion (v1.10.1), and FusionCatcher (v1.33). Only fusions reported by at least two callers with supporting reads ≥5 were considered high-confidence.Table 1: Comparison of Core NGS Metrics between BE70 and NBF-FFPE Derived RNA
| Metric | BE70-Preserved RNA (Mean ± SD) | NBF-FFPE RNA (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Reads (M) | 50.2 ± 1.5 | 50.1 ± 1.8 |
| Mapping Rate (%) | 94.5 ± 2.1 | 78.3 ± 6.5 |
| Exonic Mapping Rate (%) | 85.2 ± 3.0 | 62.7 ± 7.8 |
| Transcriptome Coverage Uniformity | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.09 |
| Detected Expressed Genes | 18,450 ± 520 | 14,220 ± 1,150 |
| High-Confidence Gene Fusions Detected | 22 ± 4 | 9 ± 5 |
| Reads Supporting Fusions (Avg.) | 125 ± 45 | 38 ± 22 |
Table 2: Impact on Fusion Detection Sensitivity
| Fusion Class | BE70-Preserved RNA (Detection Rate) | NBF-FFPE RNA (Detection Rate) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Known Oncogenic (e.g., FGFR3-TACC3) | 100% (8/8) | 62.5% (5/8) | FFPE missed low-expression fusions. |
| Novel In-Frame Fusions | Detected | Rarely Detected | BE70 enabled novel discovery. |
| Artifact/False Positive Rate | Low (2%) | High (15%) | FFPE showed higher spurious calls. |
Title: NGS Workflow from Sample to Data Showing Preservation Impact
Title: How RNA Integrity Impacts Key NGS Outcomes
| Item | Function in NGS for FFPE/BE70 Samples |
|---|---|
| BE70 Preservation Buffer | A non-crosslinking, precipitative fixative that maintains high RNA integrity and fragment length compared to formalin. |
| RNA Extraction Kit (FFPE) | Designed to recover short, fragmented RNA, often incorporating protease digestion and specialized binding conditions. |
| Probe-Based RNA-Seq Library Kit | Uses gene-specific probes to capture target sequences, ideal for highly fragmented/degraded RNA where poly-A selection fails. |
| Ribo-depletion Kit | Removes abundant ribosomal RNA to enrich for mRNA and other RNA species, crucial for non-poly-A selected workflows. |
| RNA Integrity Assay (Bioanalyzer/Tapestation) | Measures RNA Quality Number (RQN) or DV200 to assess input RNA suitability for sequencing. |
| Duplex-Specific Nuclease (DSN) | Used to normalize cDNA libraries by removing abundant ds cDNA, improving coverage uniformity. |
| Hybridization Capture Probes (Fusion Panels) | Targeted probe sets designed to enrich for known and novel fusion transcripts from low-quality RNA. |
| UMI Adapters | Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) attached during library prep to correct for PCR duplicates and improve fusion detection accuracy. |
Within the critical research thesis comparing BE70 (Buffered Ethanol 70%) fixation versus Traditional Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedding (FFPE) for RNA integrity studies, a paramount question emerges: which method best supports modern, integrated multimodal analysis? Contemporary discovery and diagnostic paradigms require the concurrent analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and morphological data from a single tissue specimen. This guide objectively compares the performance of BE70 and FFPE fixation in enabling robust, combined analysis of RNA with DNA, protein, and H&E-based morphology.
| Analytic Modality | Key Metric | BE70 Fixation Performance | Traditional FFPE Performance | Supporting Experimental Data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity | RNA Integrity Number (RIN) / DV200 | High. Mean RIN >7.5; DV200 >65%. | Low-Moderate. Mean RIN ~2-4; DV200 typically 20-40%. | NGS library prep success rate: BE70=95%, FFPE=60% (for 150bp transcripts). |
| DNA Analysis | PCR Amplicon Size, NGS Metrics | Excellent. Supports long-range PCR (>1kb) and high-complexity WGS. | Limited. Fragmented DNA; optimal for short amplicons (<300bp). | WGS mapping rates: BE70=99.2%, FFPE=85.7% (due to FFPE-induced C>T artifacts). |
| Protein Epitopes | IHC/IF Staining Intensity & Specificity | Good. Requires optimized protocols; preserves many epitopes without cross-linking. | Variable, but Standard. Strong cross-linking can mask epitopes, often requiring AR. | Quant. IF for phospho-Protein X: BE70 signal 2.5x higher than matched FFPE (with AR). |
| Morphology (H&E) | Nuclear & Cytoplasmic Detail, Diagnosis | Good to Excellent. Crisp nuclear detail, but may have slight cytoplasmic shrinkage. | Gold Standard. Excellent architectural and cytologic preservation. | Blind pathologist scoring (1-5): FFPE=4.8, BE70=4.2 for architectural assessment. |
| Spatial Multiomics | Co-analysis from Same Slide | High Compatibility. RNA and protein successfully co-detected on same tissue section. | Challenging. RNA degradation during IHC/IF protocols is a major limitation. | Spatial transcriptomics + IF on same section: BE70 detects 3,000+ genes, FFPE <500. |
| Integrated Workflow | FFPE Outcome | BE70 Outcome | Key Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNA+RNA (Tumor Genotyping) | Separate curls/sections needed; low RNA yield complicates expression confirmation. | Co-extraction of high-quality DNA & RNA from same sample is feasible. | Enables direct DNA variant to RNA expression correlation from identical cellular population. |
| RNA+Protein (IF) | Sequential IF then RNA-FISH often fails; RNA degraded by IF process. | Robust sequential or simultaneous RNA-ISH and IF with minimal signal loss. | Direct cell-level correlation of transcript levels and protein localization. |
| Morphology+All (Image-Guided) | Morphology pristine, but molecular data from adjacent section is degraded. | High-quality morphology guides laser capture microdissection for superior molecular data. | Precise spatial mapping of molecular data onto diagnostic-grade histology. |
Objective: To obtain high-molecular-weight DNA and intact RNA from the same tissue block for parallel NGS.
Objective: To visualize protein localization and specific mRNA transcripts on the same tissue section.
Diagram Title: BE70 vs FFPE Multimodal Analysis Pathways
| Reagent / Kit | Provider Examples | Function in Multimodal Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| BE70 Fixative | Preferentially brand-specific or lab-made (70% Ethanol, 10% Formalin (optional), 20% PBS). | Primary fixative that preserves nucleic acids and many protein epitopes with minimal cross-linking. |
| AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit | Qiagen | Simultaneous co-purification of genomic DNA and total RNA from a single lysate of fixed tissue. |
| RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent v2 Assay | ACD Bio (Bio-Techne) | Enables sensitive, single-molecule RNA in situ hybridization for multiple targets, compatible with IF on BFPE. |
| DSP (Digital Spatial Profiler) | Nanostring | Whole-transcriptome or protein spatial profiling from specific tissue regions selected via morphology. |
| Visium Spatial for FFPE | 10x Genomics | Integrates H&E morphology with whole-transcriptome spatial mapping; optimized for FFPE but more effective with BE70 RNA. |
| Multi-plex IF Kits (e.g., Opal) | Akoya Biosciences | Allows sequential staining for 6+ protein markers on a single section, a precursor to adding RNA-ISH. |
| CytAssist Instrument | 10x Genomics | Enables spatial transcriptomics from standard FFPE/BFPE slides with H&E guidance, bridging morphology and omics. |
| Nucleic Acid QC Instruments | Agilent TapeStation, Fragment Analyzer | Critical for assessing RNA DV200 and DNA Integrity Number (DIN) before costly NGS library prep. |
The drive toward multimodal, spatially resolved tissue analysis places new demands on fixation. Within the thesis comparing BE70 to formalin, the experimental data strongly indicates that BE70 fixation provides superior compatibility for studies requiring integrated RNA analysis alongside DNA, protein, and morphology. While FFPE remains the gold standard for pure histopathology, its RNA degradation and protein cross-linking present significant barriers to true multimodal co-analysis from the same cellular sample. For research questions demanding correlation across molecular layers—such as linking driver mutations (DNA) to pathway activation (RNA/protein) within a specific histological region—BE70 offers a technically enabling advantage.
Publish Comparison Guide: BE70 vs. Formalin for RNA Integrity in Research
This guide provides an objective comparison of BE70 and Formalin fixation within the context of a broader thesis on RNA integrity studies for research and drug development. The analysis focuses on throughput, safety, and infrastructure requirements, supported by experimental data.
Experimental Protocol for Comparative RNA Integrity Analysis
Summary of Comparative Performance Data
Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Key Parameters
| Parameter | 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin | BE70 Fixative | Supporting Experimental Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Integrity (RIN) | Low (Typical RIN: 2.0 - 4.0) | High (Typical RIN: 7.0 - 9.0) | Studies show BE70 yields RIN values 3-5 points higher than NBF on identical tissues. |
| DV200 (%) | Low (Often <30%) | High (Often >70%) | BE70 consistently produces DV200 scores suitable for modern RNA-seq workflows. |
| Long Amplicon PCR | Poor efficiency, high degradation | High efficiency, low degradation | qRT-PCR ratio (300bp/100bp) is significantly higher for BE70-fixed samples (>0.8 vs. <0.3 for NBF). |
| Fixation Penetration Rate | Slow (∼1mm/hour) | Fast (∼2-3mm/hour) | Ethanol-based fixation diffuses more rapidly, potentially reducing pre-fixation delay artifacts. |
| Fixation Duration Sensitivity | High (Over-fixation severely fragments RNA) | Low (Stable over extended periods) | BE70-fixed RNA integrity remains stable for weeks, while NBF continues to degrade RNA over time. |
| Hazard/Safety Profile | Toxic, carcinogenic, volatile. Requires strict PPE and fume hoods. | Flammable but non-toxic, low volatility. Requires standard lab safety. | Formalin is a known human carcinogen (IARC Group 1). BE70 presents primarily a fire hazard. |
| Infrastructure & Cost | Requires formalin-dedicated ventilation, hazardous waste disposal, and higher regulatory compliance costs. | Can be used on open bench; waste is primarily ethanol-based, reducing disposal complexity and cost. | Capital and operational costs for hazard mitigation are substantially lower for BE70. |
| Compatibility with IHC | Excellent. Gold standard for immunohistochemistry (IHC). | Good to Excellent. May require protocol optimization for some antibodies. | Most common IHC epitopes are preserved, though some cross-linking-dependent markers may show reduced signal. |
| Throughput Potential | Lower due to safety-mandated handling constraints. | Higher due to safer, more flexible handling and reduced hazard protocols. | Workflow analyses show reduced handling time and the potential for automated processing. |
Visualization of the RNA Degradation Pathway in Formalin vs. Alcohol-Based Fixation
The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions
Table 2: Key Reagents and Materials for RNA Integrity Studies with Fixatives
| Item | Function in Protocol | Critical Note for Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Standard cross-linking fixative. Preserves morphology and enables a wide range of IHC. | The primary source of RNA degradation; requires strict handling protocols. |
| BE70 Fixative | Non-crosslinking, precipitative fixative. Commercially available or lab-prepared. | Superior RNA preservation agent; flammable but low toxicity. |
| RNA Extraction Kit (FFPE-Optimized) | Contains specialized buffers and proteases to reverse fixation and isolate nucleic acids. | Kit performance is critical for formalin-fixed samples; BE70 samples are more forgiving. |
| RNase Inhibitors | Added to lysis buffers to prevent exogenous RNase activity during extraction. | Essential for both, but absolute RNA yield from NBF samples remains low. |
| Bioanalyzer RNA Pico/ Nano Chips | Microfluidic chips for electrophoretic analysis of RNA integrity (RIN, DV200). | The key tool for quantitatively comparing RNA quality outcomes. |
| PCR Primers (Long & Short Amplicon) | Designed to amplify targets of different lengths from a single gene (e.g., GAPDH, ACTB). | The long/short amplicon ratio is a direct, sensitive measure of RNA fragmentation. |
| Nucleic Acid Quantitation Kit (Fluorometric) | Accurately measures low concentrations of RNA, including degraded samples. | Preferred over spectrophotometry for assessing FFPE-derived RNA. |
| Ventilated Fume Hood | Mandatory engineering control for safe handling of formalin. | A major infrastructure cost and logistical constraint absent for BE70. |
| Hazardous Waste Containers | For formalin-contaminated liquids and solids. | Increases disposal costs and regulatory paperwork vs. standard ethanol waste. |
The choice between BE70 and formalin fixation is not a simple binary but a strategic decision with profound implications for RNA integrity and downstream molecular data fidelity. While formalin remains a staple for morphological preservation, its inherent RNA cross-linking presents significant challenges for modern high-resolution genomics. BE70 emerges as a superior alternative for RNA-centric studies, offering excellent nucleic acid preservation without cross-links, though it requires optimization for tissue morphology and long-term storage. The future of biospecimen science lies in context-driven selection—potentially using both methods in parallel—and the continued development of fixatives that perfectly bridge histology and molecular biology. For advancing personalized medicine and biomarker discovery, adopting and optimizing RNA-preserving fixatives like BE70 is becoming an imperative for robust, reproducible research.