How Three Scientists Made Proteins Stick
Imagine you're a detective, hunting for a specific criminal in a crowded city. You have a photo, but no way to search efficiently. That's what biologists faced in the 1970s when trying to find specific proteins hidden within the complex mixtures extracted from cells. They could separate proteins using gel electrophoresis (like sorting people by height), but analyzing them after separation was clumsy and destructive. Enter three Swiss scientists – Towbin, Staehelin, and Gordon – whose 1979 paper provided the "wanted poster" technique that revolutionized molecular biology: electrophoretic protein transfer, the heart of the Western blot.
Lift the separated proteins straight out of the fragile gel and trap them onto a sturdy sheet, where antibodies could easily find their targets.
Published in 1979, this wasn't just an incremental improvement; it opened a floodgate of discovery in molecular biology.
Before Towbin et al., identifying a specific protein in a gel was tough:
Polyacrylamide gels are delicate and hard to handle.
Probing the protein inside the gel with antibodies or other detection tools was inefficient – the reagents couldn't penetrate well, and the gel background often interfered.
Staining the gel revealed all proteins at once, but destroyed the sample. Finding one specific protein meant running multiple identical gels – a huge waste of precious sample and time.
Towbin, Staehelin, and Gordon devised an elegantly simple yet powerful solution: use electricity again, but this time to move the proteins out of the gel and onto a special paper.
Schematic of the Western blot process (Credit: Wikimedia Commons)
The gel acts like the ink pad, the nitrocellulose like the paper receiving the impression.
Towbin et al. demonstrated that proteins across a wide size range could be efficiently transferred, though larger proteins required longer transfer times.
Protein Size (kDa) | Transfer Time (hours) | Relative Amount Transferred (%) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
15 | 1 | >95 | Small proteins transfer very rapidly |
15 | 6 | >98 | Near complete transfer |
50 | 1 | ~80 | Good transfer for medium proteins |
50 | 6 | >95 | Excellent transfer |
100 | 1 | ~60 | Larger proteins transfer more slowly |
100 | 6 | ~85 | Significant transfer achieved |
150 | 1 | ~40 | Challenging size range for short times |
150 | 6 | ~75 | Requires longer transfer times |
200 | 6 | ~65 | Very large proteins benefit from optimization |
Towbin et al. primarily used radioactive antibodies, demonstrating high sensitivity for specific targets.
Detection Method | Target Protein | Minimum Detectable Amount (ng) | Advantage |
---|---|---|---|
Amido Black Stain (Direct) | Total Protein | ~100 | Visualizes all transferred proteins |
Radioactive Antibody | Viral Antigen | ~1-10 | High sensitivity, requires radioactivity |
Enzyme-Linked Antibody (EIA) | Viral Antigen | ~10-50 | Safer, colorimetric detection developed later |
The paper by Towbin, Staehelin, and Gordon wasn't just a new protocol; it was the birth certificate of the Western blot (a name coined later, playing on the Southern blot for DNA). Their electrophoretic transfer method solved a fundamental bottleneck. Almost overnight, it became possible to ask and answer questions about specific protein expression, modification, size, and interactions with unprecedented clarity and specificity.
Detecting antibodies against HIV, Lyme disease, autoimmune disorders (e.g., Lupus), and many more.
Studying gene expression, protein function, signaling pathways, and cellular responses.
Verifying drug targets and assessing drug effects on protein levels.